Council of Councils
Think Global Health
Online Store
Introduction
Over the last several decades, governments have collectively pledged to slow global warming. But despite intensified diplomacy, the world is already facing the consequences of climate…
Drone Proliferation: Three Things to Know
June 19, 2014 11:48 am (EST)
- Explainer Video
The number of countries pursuing armed drone technology is growing, a trend that may increase the likelihood that some governments may resort to lethal force, especially at flashpoints for conflict like the Middle East and East Asia. Sarah Kreps, CFR’s Stanton Nuclear Security Fellow, offers three things to know about armed drone proliferation.
More From Our Experts
-
Unmanned Arms Race: Although only the United States, Israel, and the UK have used armed drones in combat, many other countries are acquiring this technology, explains Kreps. "In particular, China and Iran have touted their armed drone capabilities," she says, while several European, Middle Eastern and Asian countries are also developing, collaborating on, or purchasing drone systems similar to that of the United States.
-
Lower Conflict Threshold: The spread of drone technology, which does not place human pilots at risk, could lead some states to opt for lethal force more often. If other countries use drones similar to the way the United States has done in recent years, "we are likely to see states carrying out cross-border attacks less discriminately," says Kreps. This is highly likely in East Asia, the Middle East, the Caucasus, Africa and other flashpoints for conflict, she says.
-
Limiting Proliferation: The international transfer of armed drones is regulated by the Missile Technology Control Regime, forged in 1987. But the non-binding accord faces relevancy challenges, says Kreps, and many countries seeking armed drones are not members. In addition to adhering to the MTCR guidelines, Washington should reflect on the precedent it is setting and clarify its targeted killings policy for other countries to consider, she adds.
More From Our Experts
Top Stories on CFR
CFR experts Steven A. Cook and David J. Scheffer join Amnesty International’s Agnes Callamard and Refugee International’s Jeremy Konyndyk to discuss the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
The highlights from Kishida Fumio's busy week in Washington.
Thirty years ago, Rwanda’s government began a campaign to eradicate the country’s largest minority group. In just one hundred days in 1994, roving militias killed around eight hundred thousand people. Would-be killers were incited to violence by the radio, which encouraged extremists to take to the streets with machetes. The United Nations stood by amid the bloodshed, and many foreign governments, including the United States, declined to intervene before it was too late. What got in the way of humanitarian intervention? And as violent conflict now rages at a clip unseen since then, can the international community learn from the mistakes of its past?