Attacks in Libya, Egypt: Three Things to Know
Videos

Attacks in Libya, Egypt: Three Things to Know

September 12, 2012 12:57 pm (EST)

Attacks in Libya, Egypt: Three Things to Know
Explainer Video

The U.S. ambassador to Libya was killed and the U.S. embassy in Cairo came under attack in separate incidents apparently spurred by a video made in the United States that disparages Islam and the prophet Mohammad. Isobel Coleman, director of the CFR’s Civil Society, Markets, and Democracy Initiative, highlights three things to know about the attacks:

- Benghazi and Cairo are not Tehran: These attacks are "not analogous to the takeover of the embassy in Iran in 1979," Coleman argues. "In neither case have the governments aided and abetted the protestors in their actions."

- Civil war may erupt in Libya: Unlike the relatively peaceful protest in Egypt, the Libya attack "could be the first salvo in almost a civil war in that country," Coleman says. The attack by a highly armed jihadi group against Libyan and American forces "underscores the problem of maintaining control in a country that is awash in arms."

- More tensions over the video are likely: "This issue is not going to go away," Coleman cautions. The Libyan government’s "lack of control over some significant parts of the population" will require increased security and attention for Libya’s international partners. Meanwhile, in Cairo, heightened tensions between Muslims and Christians are likely to continue.

Close

Top Stories on CFR

Mexico

Organized crime’s hold on local governments fuels record election violence; Europe’s cocaine pipeline shifting to the Southern Cone.

Defense and Security

John Barrientos, a captain in the U.S. Navy and a visiting military fellow at CFR, and Kristen Thompson, a colonel in the U.S. Air Force and a visiting military fellow at CFR, sit down with James M. Lindsay to provide an inside view on how the U.S. military is adapting to the challenges it faces.

Myanmar

The Myanmar army is experiencing a rapid rise in defections and military losses, posing questions about the continued viability of the junta’s grip on power.